Showing posts with label Monsanto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monsanto. Show all posts

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Roundup Herbicide Linked To Parkinson’s-Related Brain Damage




Alarming new research published in the journal Neurotoxicology and Teratology supports the emerging connection between glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup herbicide, and neurodegenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonian disorders.

Published this month (April, 2012), the new study entitled “Glyphosate induced cell death through apoptotic and authophagic mechanisms,” investigated the potential brain-damaging effects of herbicides, which the authors stated “have been recognized as the main environmental factor associated with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease.”1

They found that glyphosate inhibited the viability of differentiated test cells (PC12, adrenal medula derived), in both dose-and-time dependent manners. The researchers also found that “glyphosate induced cell death via authophagy pathways in addition to activating apoptotic pathways.”

Roundup herbicide is now a ubiquitous contaminant in our air, rain, groundwater, and food, making complete avoidance near impossible. A growing body of experimental evidence now indicates that it in addition to its neurotoxicity it also has the following.

Modes of Toxicity

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Brazil orders Nestlé to label GM products

Brazil's court had to over turn their governments decision to endorse non labeling.
This same predicament is going on now in the US. They do not want us to know if the food we're buying is frankenfood.
The big food ccorporations like Nestle along with Monsanto, are paying millions and millions of dollars to lobbyists to try and defeat California's propostion on the right to mandatory labeling.
We ALL have a right to know what's the food we buy as well as the choice to not buy it.

A court in Brazil has ordered Nestlé to impose mandatory labelling for all its products in the country highlighting more than 1% genetically modified (GM) ingredients.

Friday, August 31, 2012

Drought and SuperBugs Devastate U.S. Corn Crop

In yet another instance of "unintended consequences," a recent study has determined that this year’s drought damage to corn crops is even worse because of Bt corn, and failure to rotate crops.

GreenMedInfo, claiming to be the world’s most widely referenced, evidence-based natural medicine resource, posted an August 23 article revealing the result of the findings of farmers and crop and pesticide management experts. The website specializes in posting abstracts (brief summaries of research articles or in-depth analyses of particular subjects) of scientific findings and academic papers. Dr. Bruce Potter, University of Minnesota professor and farmer Charlie Sandager concluded that the primary corn pest rootworm has developed resistance to the proteins in the GMO (genetically modified organisms) Bt Corn that was designed to kill the pests.


Bt corn is a type of GMO and the subject of the recent investigation into the rootworm outbreak. One effect of the pest’s presence is that it prevents corn roots from absorbing water, especially serious given this year’s drought. Pest experts suggest that the primary reason for the rootworm-infested crops is that rootworms have become resistant to the Bt protein, resulting in strong and larger rootworm populations.

But not only are corn plants unable to absorb water, the plants become unstable and can easily topple over. Sandager said, “Strong wind came up and it just tipped the corn plants over like a big old tree.”

Indeed, RawStory reported that last fall, the EPA warned of the problem. Bt corn, engineered a decade ago by Monsanto specifically to ward off the rootworm, is losing its battle. Even the EPA wondered if the company’s monitoring was “inadequate and likely to miss

GMO: The Secret the Food Industry Is Spending Millions to Keep

Big Agriculture and food companies are shelling out gobs of cash ahead of November's election to convince Californians to vote against a proposed law that would require businesses to label products that contain genetically modified organisms.

Proponents of Proposition 37 applaud the strict labeling requirements and say it will help consumers make better purchasing decisions. Opponents say that the labels are misleading and overly burdensome to food producers. Not only that, they claim, but compliance would be costly -- an expense that would likely drive up the price of goods in the grocery store
.

Shouldn't the consumer be the one to decide what's to overly burdensome for them?
How is it misleading to say that this food is a product of GMO experimentation?
Does not the consumer have the right to deny the status of guinea pig over products that have never been tested for human consumption?

The money is behind the opposition, literally.

Prop 37's opponents include Monsanto (MON), PepsiCo (PEP), Coca-Cola (KO), Hershey (HSY), and Kellogg (K). Together these companies and other large agricultural concerns have already spent millions to fight the proposed labeling law.

Wake up America, it's time to back California's request for the requirements of Proposition 37.

But it's not just about labels; it's about setting a precedent.

Opponents aren't just worried that the law will drive California consumers away from their products. They also fear that the rest of the country will follow California's lead and give the anti-GMO movement traction in other states.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Monsanto failures

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/05/business/05monsanto.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss



The latest blow came last week, when early returns from this year’s harvest showed that Monsanto’s newest product, SmartStax corn, which contains eight inserted genes, was providing yields no higher than the company’s less expensive corn, which contains only three foreign genes.

Monsanto has already been forced to sharply cut prices on SmartStax and on its newest soybean seeds, called Roundup Ready 2 Yield, as sales fell below projections.

But there is more. Sales of Monsanto’s Roundup, the widely used herbicide, has collapsed this year under an onslaught of low-priced generics made in China. Weeds are growing resistant to Roundup, dimming the future of the entire Roundup Ready crop franchise. And the Justice Department is investigating Monsanto for possible antitrust violations.

Until now, Monsanto’s main challenge has come from opponents of genetically modified crops, who have slowed their adoption in Europe and some other regions. Now, however, the skeptics also include farmers and investors who were once in Monsanto’s camp.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Study Proves Three Monsanto Corn Varieties' Noxiousness to the Organism

http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-6817-0-6-6--.html

It's easier to list what's not made with GMO corn than what is.
90% of the world's seed comes from Monsanto. We've been eating it for years and it's toxic.
Do you wonder if Monsanto actually didn't know this and it's just a coincidence that it now has it's own personal representative heading up the FDA?
Can you smell the stench of corruption?

A study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences demonstrates the toxicity of three genetically modified corn varieties from the American seed company Monsanto, the Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (Criigen, based in Caen), which participated in that study, announced Friday, December 11.

"For the first time in the world, we've proven that GMO are neither sufficiently healthy nor proper to be commercialized. [...] Each time, for all three GMOs, the kidneys and liver, which are the main organs that react to a chemical food poisoning, had problems," indicated Gilles-Eric Séralini, an expert member of the Commission for Biotechnology Reevaluation, created by the EU in 2008.

Caen and Rouen University researchers, as well as Criigen researchers, based their analyses on the data supplied by Monsanto to health authorities to obtain the green light for commercialization, but they draw different conclusions after new statistical calculations. According to Professor Séralini, the health authorities based themselves on a reading of the conclusions Monsanto has presented and not on conclusions drawn from the totality of the data. The researchers were able to obtain complete documentation following a legal decision.

"Monsanto's tests, effected over 90 days, are

A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health
http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

AP INVESTIGATION: Monsanto seed biz role revealed

http://www.ajc.com/business/ap-investigation-monsanto-seed-240072.html

Power is not "He who holds the money supply"
Power comes to those that hold the food supply!
You can live without money, but you can't live without food.
My question for the AP is, WHY NOW?
Where were you when all the power that Monsanto now has, was being accumulated?
An answer I really want to know


"We now believe that Monsanto has control over as much as 90 percent of (seed genetics). This level of control is almost unbelievable," said Neil Harl, agricultural economist at Iowa State University who has studied the seed industry for decades. "The upshot of that is that it's tightening Monsanto's control, and makes it possible for them to increase their prices long term. And we've seen this happening the last five years, and the end is not in sight."

At issue is how much power one company can have over seeds, the foundation of the world's food supply. Without stiff competition, Monsanto could raise its seed prices at will, which in turn could raise the cost of everything from animal feed to wheat bread and cookies.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Monsanto's choice to run food safety for the FDA

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/fox-guard-henhouse-former-monsanto-vp

Seriously do you still think your government isn't bought off


Obama's considering appointing a former Monsanto vice president, Mike Taylor, to head the Food Safety Working Group at the FDA.

As Jill Richardson writes at LaVidaLocavore at the link above, Taylor thinks the FDA wastes too much time on food safety inspections at meat packing plants. Further, he believes that one of their main problems is that they have to slow down their line speed too much.

Everyone who's read anything about the horrendous working conditions at US meatpacking plants knows that incomplete kills before slaughter and worker injuries increase dramatically when line speeds increase.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Not what the American people ordered – HR 2749, martial law and the enslavement of th

http://farmwars.info/?p=1145

HR 2749 is a strange bill in many ways. While the other “food safety” bills have been around since winter, allowing for much public discussion on the internet, HR 2749 has only suddenly appeared. It is a mutant conglomeration of the worst of the other bills, with the addition of one very original part – martial law.
When it was a draft, it was Waxman’s bill. But once given a number, it became Dingel’s who already had a “food safety” bill, HR 759. So Waxman got none and Dingel got two.


* HR 2749 would give FDA the power to order a quarantine of a geographic area, including “prohibiting or restricting the movement of food or of any vehicle being used or that has been used to transport or hold such food within the geographic area.”

[This - "that has been used to transport or hold such food" - would mean all cars that have ever brought groceries home or any pickup someone has eaten take-out in, so this means ALL TRANSPORTATION can be shut down under this. This is using food as a cover for martial law.]

Under this provision, farmers markets and local food sources could be shut down, even if they are not the source of the contamination. The agency can halt all movement of all food in a geographic area.

[This is also a means of total control over the population under the cover of food, and at any time.] See this DailyKos entry.


The bill is unusual, too, because slow as it was to appear. The little bugger of bill has made up for it since. It got a number on June 10, went to committee on June 17, passed instantly, and is headed for a vote on the floor of the House.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who did write these bills? It seems Monsanto had not only a hand, but a “defining” influence. http://farmwars.info/?p=594

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Fox News Kills Monsanto Milk Story

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axU9ngbTxKw

The Risks of Genetically Modified Foods

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/647.html

At 3 minutes and 51 seconds into this video it becomes riveting.


"They knew and didn't tell"

We all know how utterly corrupt the FDA is, but sometimes the full significance of this fact doesn't resonate.

This video is a major wake up call.

Short version:

The FDA gave Monsanto and it friends a free pass on genetically modified organisms.

They've helped suppress the science that shows food produced this way is dangerous.

Here are the foods that are genetically modified: milk, corn, soybeans, canola oil and cottonseed oil.

One simple way to protect yourself is to stop eating these foods unless they come from a certified organic source.

For more information on how to protect yourself from the corporate/government criminals that are selling garbage and poison and calling it food, go here:

http://www.TheRealFoodChannel.com

Thursday, May 7, 2009

50 HARMFUL EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) FOODS

http://www.raw-wisdom.com/genetically-modified-food


We are confronted with what is undoubtedly the single most potent technology the world has ever known - more powerful even than atomic energy. Yet it is being released throughout our environment and deployed with superficial or no risk assessments - as if no one needs to worry an iota about its unparalleled powers to harm life as we know it - and for all future generations.