Nancy Pelosi Decode

Full interview at the link, but the dedcode is for the last three minutes worth
Nancy is talking to her people and gave them a heads up, into what's going to occur
She says lets look into the future, and then immediately starts talking about 10's of thousands of people coming in from China.

She's also telling her people doing the groundwork, that their funding has dried up from their corporate sponsors. People like, cops, teachers, medical personal and even postal workers.
All those people that would see kids and where they lived on a daily basis. The tip workers you might say. They're tracing money

Her last sentences go on to talk about the injection of disinfectant that the President spoke off the cuff (or did he lol) and how that what it really meant was, embalming.
The BIG question is, why Nancy would refer to it's outcome in that manner.

Disinfectant | Definition of Disinfectant at Dictionary.com

www.dictionary.com › browse › disinfectant

any chemical agent used chiefly on inanimate objects to destroy or inhibit the growth of harmful organisms. adjective. serving as a disinfectant. 

Embalming | Definition of Embalming at Dictionary.com

www.dictionary.com › browse › embalming

to treat (a dead body) so as to preserve it, as with chemicals, drugs, or balsams. to preserve from oblivion; keep in memory: his deeds embalmed in the hearts of his disciples.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/04/26/sotu-nancy-pelosi-full.cnn

Pelosi sour over booming economy, calls for more government programs

No economic news during the Trump presidency will make Nancy Pelosi happy.

The House Speaker reacted negatively to the April jobs report that found a 3.6 percent unemployment rate and record results for women and African-Americans.

“The April jobs report numbers show some promising news, yet these gains hide the true weight of the economic uncertainty felt by millions of hard-working Americans,” Pelosi said in a statement.

“Unfortunately, the evidence shows that most of the economic gains continue to benefit those already well-off. We must do more to ensure that the economy is benefiting every family in every community, and that all Americans have the opportunity to move ahead in our economy.”

She huffed, “Republicans’ shameful special interest agenda continues to undermine the health and financial security of middle class families across the country,” before attacking Republican efforts for tax relief and lifting Obamacare burdens.

She went on to call for higher government spending and more social programs to “pave the way for progress for all families, in all communities for generations to come.”

The data shows the Hispanic unemployment rate is the lowest ever recorded.

Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi

It's not to hard to see how Bob Mueller would be deeply disturbed, after watching the House Oversite committee for the last 2 days, with Nadler as it Chairman.
I've watched to many hearing to count in my lifetime ( yes I am a nerd like that lol), to not know what Nadler is doing, is completely against the parliamentary rule book, they use to run by. It keeps it far, so that both the minority, and the majority, both have an equal opportunity of say, during the holding of the hearings.
Nadler has completely abolished the procedure. The minority get virtually nothing to say, and no time to do it in.
It's Nadler's way, or the highway, and no objections, will be tolerated
He also knows, that he's not allowed to see the full un-redacted report.
I was surprised, that the Department of Justice, made a compromise for him, which he refused to accept.
Grand Jury private information is never revealed, and neither are other investigations that are in progress. That's just a rule of law.
Example: You gave testimony about the Mob and ruled in favor of trial. They have this thing about retribution, so it's not safe to have your name out their, because dead men/women tell no tales
Nadler knows this, and yet he persists in a manner, that is truly unbecoming toward the image, of the House of Representatives.
He accuses the President of being a dictator, when he himself, acts like one

Jack Posobiec 

@JackPosobiec

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr today and is urging Nadler to push up his hearing to testify and correct the record as soon as possible

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1124116036272496640

Pelosi says Barr 'lied to Congress' and committed a crime, as DOJ blasts 'reckless' comments

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi alleged Thursday that Attorney General Bill Barr “lied to Congress” and reportedly told colleagues in a closed-door meeting that he committed a crime -- prompting a fiery rebuke from the Justice Department.

Pelosi, D-Calif., addressed the issue publicly during a press conference late Thursday morning, hedging a bit on the question of whether he committed a crime with his prior testimony.
“He lied to Congress. And if anybody else did that, it would be considered a crime,” she told reporters. “Nobody is above the law. Not the president of the United States. Not the attorney general.”

Well it seems to me Mark Zuckerberg did concerning Facebook data collections well as conservative bannings , and nothing happened to him, and Jack Dorsey did to concerning Twitter banning conservatives. Are they just to big to count, or is it because they donate big bucks to some of the congressional listeners?

She was referring to an April 9 hearing, where Crist had asked whether Barr knew what prompted reports that prosecutors on the special counsel team were frustrated with his initial summary. Barr said he did not.

But this week, The Washington Post first reported that Special Counsel Robert Mueller contacted Barr, both in a letter and in a phone call, to express concerns after Barr released his four-page summary of Mueller’s findings in March. Mueller pushed Barr to release the executive summaries written by the special counsel’s office.

However, according to both the Post and the Justice Department, Mueller made clear that he did not feel that Barr’s summary was inaccurate. Instead, Mueller told Barr that media coverage of the letter had “misinterpreted” the results of the probe concerning obstruction of justice.

And it seems to me that the very same media that reported Barr lied to Nancy, are the very same media that Mueller is saying misinterpreted ( reported lies to the rest of us) the true results of Mueller's findings, just like the democrat's seem to have, not Barr.
And that's not something he has control over. So it's apparent at this point why he wouldn't know the reason for the prosecutors on the special council would be upset. How could he know?

One thing is for sure though, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and it's not to hard to see why Nancy's freshman act in the manner they do. They learned it from the Speaker of the House herself.
One would think that as the leader Nancy would set a better example, but obviously that's to much to ask for.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-says-barr-lied-to-congress-committed-a-crime

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-says-barr-lied-to-congress-committed-a-crime

John Boehner to fly commercial as speaker

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44943.html

I think it's time "WE" clawed back a little money from Nancy.
The Air Force plane she used, had it's own private bedroom in it.
I suppose that was for security to


House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Wednesday he intends to take commercial flights home when he moves up to speaker in the new Congress.

“Over the last 20 years, I have flown back and forth to my district on commercial aircraft, and I am going to continue to do that,” he told reporters.

Poor America: And this is how you got that way

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/debt-has-increased-5-trillion-speaker-pe



Remember when Nancy said this?
Pay as you go, no more putting it on the tab.
Well that's not exactly what happened, is it.
The Senate went out of it's rights of duty, to resurrect the bank bailout, after the House had voted it down.
Not only did they exceed the boundaries of their duty, they also disregarded the voice of "the People".
The banks are once again begging for money, if they don't get it they will die, and even though it's detrimental to the taxpayer, the FED plans on granting their wishes.
People that is our money the FED is using, and what they are using it for is not helping us out.
It's being used to keep the banks afloat.
Well that beast is so dead it stinks.
We cannot keep adding to the deficit, your dollar buys nothing now.
If they add more, it buys less.

When Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) gave her inaugural address as speaker of the House in 2007, she vowed there would be “no new deficit spending.” Since that day, the national debt has increased by $5 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

"After years of historic deficits, this 110th Congress will commit itself to a higher standard: Pay as you go, no new deficit spending,” Pelosi said in her speech from the speaker’s podium. “Our new America will provide unlimited opportunity for future generations, not burden them with mountains of debt

Calif. lawmakers want foreclosure investigation

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Calif-lawmakers-want-apf-156017385.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=

Nancy Pelosi,
Didn't she just have congress vote on passing off an electronic signature as legal for a Notarized document?
I can just imagine the fraud that could be produced out of that one can't you?
I could sell your car for you and you would even know I did it until it turned up missing.
This investigation is no job for the "collusionists" from congress.
This is a crime and should be treated as such.
I wonder if this is Nancy's way of covering her democratic ass if Obama signs it?
God Damn, they think we're stupid.

More than 30 House members from California are calling on federal regulators to investigate whether mortgage companies broke the law by using paperwork that may have contained errors.

The Democratic lawmakers, led by Rep. Zoe Lofgren and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, urged bank regulators and the Justice Department to probe whether mortgage companies violated any laws in handling foreclosures and borrowers' requests for loan assistance.

"It appears that we aren't dealing with isolated incidents and that a pattern of misconduct and obstruction is present," Lofgren said Tuesday.

House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742_pf.html

What won't the government do to get what it wants?

After laying the groundwork for a decisive vote this week on the Senate's health-care bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Monday that she might attempt to pass the measure without having members vote on it.

Instead, Pelosi (D-Calif.) would rely on a procedural sleight of hand: The House would vote on a more popular package of fixes to the Senate bill; under the House rule for that vote, passage would signify that lawmakers "deem" the health-care bill to be passed.

The tactic -- known as a "self-executing rule" or a "deem and pass" -- has been commonly used, although never to pass legislation as momentous as the $875 billion health-care bill. It is one of three options that Pelosi said she is considering for a late-week House vote, but she added that she prefers it because it would politically protect lawmakers who are reluctant to publicly support the measure.

"It's more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know," the speaker said in a roundtable discussion with bloggers Monday. "But I like it," she said, "because people don't have to vote on the Senate bill."

Republicans quickly condemned the strategy, framing it as an effort to avoid responsibility for passing the legislation, and some suggested that Pelosi's plan would be unconstitutional.

"It's very painful and troubling to see the gymnastics through which they are going to avoid accountability," Rep. David Dreier (Calif.), the senior Republican on the House Rules Committee, told reporters. "And I hope very much that, at the end of the day, that if we are going to have a vote, we will have a clean up-or-down vote that will allow the American people to see who is supporting this Senate bill and who is not supporting this Senate bill."

House leaders have worked for days to round up support for the legislation, but the Senate measure has drawn fierce opposition from a broad spectrum of members. Antiabortion Democrats say it would permit federal funding for abortion, liberals oppose its tax on high-cost insurance plans, and Republicans say the measure overreaches and is too expensive.

Some senior lawmakers have acknowledged in recent days that Democrats lack the votes for passage. Pelosi, however, predicted Monday that she would deliver.

Another federal failure

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/02/obama-stimulus-weatherization.html

And they are still running this show WHY?
The incompetence is phenomenal

Who could forget the $5 billion in Obama administration stimulus money that was going to rapidly create nearly 90,000 green jobs across the country in these tough economic times and make so many thousands of homes all snuggy and warm and energy-efficient these very snowy days?

Well, a new report due out this morning will show the $5-billion program is so riddled with drafts that so far it's weatherized only about 9,000 homes.

Based on the initial Obama-Biden program promise that it would create 87,000 new jobs its first year, that would be about 10 jobs for each home weatherized so far. Makes for pretty crowded doorways.

ABC News reports that the General Accountability Office will declare today that the Energy Department has fallen woefully behind -- about 98.5% behind -- the 593,000 homes it initially predicted would be weatherized in the Recovery Act's very first, very chilly year.

The Energy Department is run by Steven Chu, like President Obama a Nobel Prize winner. You'll never guess what the federal government blames for the lack of significant progress.

RED tape.

Not duct tape. Not weatherstripping

Congress Went to Denmark, You Got the Bill

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/25/cbsnews_investigates/main6140406.shtml

The kids partied hard on our dime.

Thanks to a recently filed Congressional expense reports there's new light shed on the Copenhagen Climate Summit in Denmark and how much it cost taxpayers.

CBS News Investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports official filings and our own investigation show at least 106 people from the House and Senate attended - spouses, a doctor, a protocol expert and even a photographer.

Read the Congressional Expense Report

For 15 Democratic and 6 Republican Congressmen, food and rooms for two nights cost $4,406 tax dollars each. That's $2,200 a day - more than most Americans spend on their monthly mortgage payment.

CBS News asked members of Congress and staff about whether they're mindful that it's public tax dollars they're spending. Many said they had never even seen the bills or the expense reports.

Copenhagen Congressional Junket

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., is a key climate change player. He went to Copenhagen last year. Last week, we asked him about the $2,200-a-day bill for room and food.

Obama endorses deficit task force

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-endorses-deficit-task-apf-3690851821.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=1&asset=&ccode=

What a joke!
Why waste the money if you know nothing is going to get done?
This kind of garbage needs to be voted out of office.
You can see they're not fit to decide anything for, let alone run this country.
Notice how nothing gets decided, if anything ever does, until after the election.
It's not only time to audit the FED
It's time to audit the government.
It's impossible for them to do it themselves, and where they keep spending it and sending it has some serious questions as to the merit of it's expense.

President Barack Obama Saturday endorsed a bipartisan plan to name a special task force charged with coming up with a plan to curb the spiraling budget deficit, though the idea has lots of opposition from both his allies and rivals on Capitol Hill.

The bipartisan 18-member panel backed by Obama would study the issue for much of the year and, if 14 members agree, report a deficit reduction blueprint after the November elections that would be voted on before the new Congress convenes next year. The 14 would have to include at least half of the panel's Republicans -- a big obstacle.

[B]The general belief is that the task force idea will fail since many Republicans oppose the plan as a recipe for tax increases, while Democrats worry it'll lead to cuts to Medicare and Social Security benefits. And lots of powerful Democrats say the task force would encroach on their decision-making powers.

Still, some moderate Senate Democrats such as Evan Bayh of Indiana had demanded Obama's endorsement of the deficit panel idea, refusing to commit their votes for the unpopular debt limit measure next week without it.

The task force plan was offered by the top senators on the Budget Committee, Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Judd Gregg, R-N.H., who see it as the only way for Republicans and Democrats alike to take the leap into the treacherous business of curbing the deficit with politically unpopular tax increases and spending cuts.

Much of the opposition comes from top Democrats such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus of Montana, whose toes would be stepped on since the findings of the task force automatically receive a vote in both the House and Senate, eroding their power.

Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who supported the task before anti-tax activist Grover Norquist came out against the idea, is now strongly opposed. House GOP Leader John Boehner of Ohio appears opposed as well.
[/B]

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail

http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=153583

These people are insane

Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.

In response to the JCT letter, Camp said: “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail. It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.”