Intelligence Committee Chair Describes Explosive Confrontation Between Netanyahu and American Ambassador

And now, for the ultimate of release coincidences, in a
"No look this way" directive, we will all hear the rehash, Of Mike Roger's much denied argument, with "the Chosen's" very own, bad tempered bad boy,
Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Damn I hate reruns

Rep. Mike Rogers, the Michigan Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, says that his much-discussed meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem late last month did, in fact, devolve into an sharp confrontation between Netanyahu and the American ambassador to Israel, the former National Security Council official (and former Obama campaign Jewish liaison), Dan Shapiro.

Rogers told a Michigan radio interviewer earlier this week that he had not previously witnessed such a high-level confrontation, and he described Israeli leaders as being at "wits' end" over what they see as President Obama's unwillingness to provide them with his "red lines" in the effort to stop Iran's nuclear program. He also said that neither the Israelis nor the Iranians believe that Obama would use force to stop the nuclear program. (UPDATE: Rogers said as well he believes the Israelis will "probably" bomb Iran if they don't get clearer red lines from the U.S.)

Rogers description of the meeting directly contradicts repeated Administration assertions that there is "no daylight" on the Iran issue with the Israeli government. Shortly after the meeting took place, Israeli press reports appeared suggesting that Netanyahu and Shapiro had engaged in an argument, but Shapiro

Zionist casino mogul Sheldon Adelson rocks Israeli media

Oh that explains alot.
The republican Presidential nominee has been bought and paid for.

Israel Hayom, which strongly supports Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is owned and funded by Mr Adelson, the American casino billionaire who is a major Republican Party benefactor, and opponent of a two state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. After supporting the unsuccessful GOP primary candidate Newt Gingrich, he indicated he could spend up to $100m on Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign

Barack Obama poised to announce the 'red lines' that would trigger a US attack on Iran

It is long past the time to ask just who in the hell is running the government of the United States of America, Israel or it's elected official.
The US cannot finacial sustain another war, but because the spoiled child called Israel wants their own way, they persist with a constant pressure that Obama feels threatened enough to bow to because of it being an election year.
The chosen children need to sacrifice their own rather than
use the children of America to accomplish their dirty deeds.
If this war does go through, it's time to count the role of duel citizenship within the electoral body of our country's legal representatives.
I don't give a crap who their friends are "We" as a nation cannot even contemplate it.
If they do push it, it is then time to purge the stock market of anything that can be turned into a profit by it's use through war.
When war stops being profitable, there will be no more war.

As his naval forces prepare to stage unprecedented manoeuvres in the Persian Gulf, the president is said to be seeking to match growing military pressure on Tehran by making an explicit declaration of what the US will not tolerate.

Mr Obama has faced mounting criticism from Israel for failing publicly to state how far he is prepared to allow Iran to go before ordering military action.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, accused the president of lacking "resolve" on Sunday when he denounced the international community for not "placing a clear red line" for Iran.

Anxious to prevent Israel launching a unilateral attack, Mr Obama is considering complying with Mr Netanyahu's demand, the New York Times said.

An internal debate is under way within the White House as to how specific a

Netanyahu slams 'disgrace' of Tehran summit

The use of the word Houlocaust, as well as that of the word anti-semitic, need to be addressed a little later on.
And I will get to it.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday slammed the wide international participation at a Non-Aligned summit in Tehran as a "stain on humanity" following Iran's denial of Israel's right to exist.

"Today, over 120 countries are in Tehran, saluting a regime that not only denies the Holocaust but pledges to annihilate the Jewish state, brutalises its own people, colludes in the murder of thousands of innocent Syrians and leads millions in chanting 'Death to America, death to Israel'," he said.

"So many in the international community appear to have learned nothing. I think this is a disgrace and a stain on humanity," Netanyahu said in a statement.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon, in Tehran for the summit of the 120-member

Netanyahu ducks U.S. nuclear summit, fearing censure

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6375QC20100409

Why the double standard? We invaded Iraq for evasion of this very same matter.
As a matter of fact the invasion was done on suspicion only since NO weapons of Mass Destruction were ever found.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has withdrawn from a nuclear security summit in Washington next week, fearing Muslim delegates will demand Israel give up its assumed atomic arsenal.

By staying outside the 1970 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Israel has not had to forswear nuclear arms nor admit international inspectors to its Dimona reactor, which experts believe has produced plutonium for between 80 and 200 warheads.