Thursday, May 2, 2019

Allied leaders were anti-Nazi, but not anti-racist. We’re now paying the price for their failure.




How pompous the youth of today, are over their superior knowledge, to the likes of Churchill and Roosevelt had.
Perhaps if they took the time, to understand that wealth of information came from 70 years of after thought, all placed neatly in a library for them to learn from, they would thank those historians rather than to consider their country a failure and it's leaders inept.




Didn’t we already fight — and win — this war?
Well, not exactly. Because while Allied countries opposed the Nazis and Allied troops defeated them, the leaders of the United States and Britain rarely attacked the core tenet of Nazism: the belief in a master race.

In my World War II class recently, I had my students pore through the speeches and letters of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the years around the war’s start in 1939, searching for his basis for opposing the Nazis. They found Churchill wanted to stand up to the Nazis’ expansionism, fight their anti-democracy posture and resist what he called (but largely left undefined) their anti-Christianity. What he did not do, however, was call for the destruction of the essence of Nazism: race supremacy.

Measles vaccines kill more children than the measles… and it’s not even close



With all of the hysteria and fear-mongering about measles that’s sweeping mainstream media headlines these days, one might assume that children everywhere are dropping dead from this chickenpox-like infection. But according to official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), not a single person has died while being infected with measles in more than 15 years.
On the other hand, it’s an undeniable fact that at least100 people have died as a consequence of receiving the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella, which we’ve all been told by government health authorities, is supposed to protect against measles.

As is now obvious to everyone who’s actually paying attention, the MMR vaccine is actually far more dangerous than measles itself, which back in the 1950s and 1960s was joked about in television shows like “The Brady Bunch” for being a harmless rite of passage from childhood into adulthood.

Hospital decides not to remove oxygen from defiant patient


We were told, that the Obamacare death panels, were a thing of overactive imaginations.
Now it would seem that statement was a lie, and death panels are a fact of reality.




Cassie Cassidy, 64, is in Fairview Hospital in Edina, Minnesota, with lung cancer. "She is on oxygen, not on a ventilator – but she does require supplemental oxygen to stay comfortable and to sustain her life," says Alexandra Snyder of Life Legal Defense Foundation.
Cassidy's health care proxy informed her the hospital planned to remove the oxygen, which would have caused her death – a plan to which Cassidy objected.
Snyder reports there's now been a change of plans. "The hospital had a meeting with the health care proxy and we were informed that the hospital is now complying with the patient's wishes and she will remain on oxygen," says Snyder.
She adds that Life Legal Defense Foundation is prepared to re-enter case, if necessary, to protect Cassidy's life and obtain the hospital's compliance with state law.

Original story:

High school may erase mural of George Washington: ‘traumatizes students’





 Northern California public school district may remove a mural of George Washington from the halls of George Washington High School due to concerns that it’s offensive and demeaning to Native Americans and African-Americans.
The controversy comes after a working group determined the mural, made up of several panels, “traumatizes students and community members.” But advocates for keeping the 83-year-old mural say that removing it ignores the intent of the artist and represents an attempt to erase history.

Huber Meeting, Graham DONE, CNN Loves Trump!

CNN speechless, Huber meets with someone special, Nellie Our to be indicted and Barr don't take no mouth!





Pelosi says Barr 'lied to Congress' and committed a crime, as DOJ blasts 'reckless' comments





House Speaker Nancy Pelosi alleged Thursday that Attorney General Bill Barr “lied to Congress” and reportedly told colleagues in a closed-door meeting that he committed a crime -- prompting a fiery rebuke from the Justice Department.
Pelosi, D-Calif., addressed the issue publicly during a press conference late Thursday morning, hedging a bit on the question of whether he committed a crime with his prior testimony.
“He lied to Congress. And if anybody else did that, it would be considered a crime,” she told reporters. “Nobody is above the law. Not the president of the United States. Not the attorney general.”
Well it seems to me Mark Zuckerberg did concerning Facebook data collections well as conservative bannings , and nothing happened to him, and Jack Dorsey did to concerning Twitter banning conservatives. Are they just to big to count, or is it because they donate big bucks to some of the congressional listeners?
She was referring to an April 9 hearing, where Crist had asked whether Barr knew what prompted reports that prosecutors on the special counsel team were frustrated with his initial summary. Barr said he did not.

But this week, The Washington Post first reported that Special Counsel Robert Mueller contacted Barr, both in a letter and in a phone call, to express concerns after Barr released his four-page summary of Mueller’s findings in March. Mueller pushed Barr to release the executive summaries written by the special counsel’s office.

However, according to both the Post and the Justice Department, Mueller made clear that he did not feel that Barr’s summary was inaccurate. Instead, Mueller told Barr that media coverage of the letter had “misinterpreted” the results of the probe concerning obstruction of justice.
And it seems to me that the very same media that reported Barr lied to Nancy, are the very same media that Mueller is saying misinterpreted ( reported lies to the rest of us) the true results of Mueller's findings, just like the democrat's seem to have, not Barr.
And that's not something he has control over. So it's apparent at this point why he wouldn't know the reason for the prosecutors on the special council would be upset. How could he know?

One thing is for sure though, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and it's not to hard to see why Nancy's freshman act in the manner they do. They learned it from the Speaker of the House herself.
One would think that as the leader Nancy would set a better example, but obviously that's to much to ask for.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-says-barr-lied-to-congress-committed-a-crime




REPORT: BORDER AGENTS WILL SOON HAVE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE ASYLUM CLAIMS ON THE SPOT



Anonymous source and we all know how that can go,
But what a hell of an idea, that should have been implemented long ago
I don't find the idea to strange either, since you do the same thing, when seeking a mortgage loan
You pre qualify to see if you're even eligible
It saves a lot of your time and the mortgage company's money
It does cost money for title searches and appraisals, not to mention all those contracts that have to be drawn up that the mortgage company pays for up front, even if they do stick you with the bill in the end.
There's no point in any of it, if a person doesn't qualify in the end, in order to sign the contract, so the mortgage company can get it's upfront fees back.
And they sure don't work for free
It would behoove us as a Country to apply the same logic the mortgage company does
And save us alot of money in the long run. Only 10% of those seeking asylum actually qualify, but the duration of their application can go on for up to 10 years, and during that time "We" the People are paying them an allowance to live, and it's sizably more than 5 dollars a week.



President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to give law enforcement officials the authority to conduct interviews with asylum seekers arriving on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Under the upcoming plan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers would train Border Patrol agents deployed on the southern border on how to perform “credible fear interviews,” according to sources who spoke with the Washington Examiner. A migrant illegally crossing the border would be subjected to an interview by an agent shortly after apprehension and would only be allowed to claim asylum if they pass the interview.
The changes would reduce the number of migrants who are waiting for a decision on their asylum case, alleviating an immigration court system bogged down with some 900,000 pending cases, and more quickly deport foreign nationals who do not qualify.
“If that gets rolled out and we actually start deporting people within a timely manner, you’re going to see the numbers drop exponentially,” an official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said to the Examiner.

Ukraine embassy says DNC operative reached out for dirt on Trump in 2016

Ukraine's embassy wrote that a Democratic National Committee (DNC) insider reached out in 2016 seeking dirt on President Trump's team, according to a bombshell new reportThursday that further fueled Republican allegations that Democrats were the ones improperly colluding with foreign agents during the campaign.
Ambassador Valeriy Chaly said DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa pushed for Ukraine's then-President Petro Poroshenko to mention Paul Manafort's ties to Ukraine publicly during a visit to the U.S., and sought detailed financial information on his dealings in the country, The Hill reported. At the time, Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman.
"The Embassy got to know Ms. Chalupa because of her engagement with Ukrainian and other diasporas in Washington D.C., and not in her DNC capacity. We’ve learned about her DNC involvement later," Chaly said in a statement released by the Ukrainian embassy. "We were surprised to see Alexandra’s interest in Mr. Paul Manafort’s case. It was her own cause. The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way, as we were convinced that this is a strictly U.S. domestic matter."
Chaly continued: "All ideas floated by Alexandra were related to approaching a Member of Congress with a purpose to initiate hearings on Paul Manafort or letting an investigative journalist ask President Poroshenko a question about Mr. Manafort during his public talk in Washington, D.C."

Three days in the hole

Three days in the hole, but at least I'm in good company, and know exactly why.
Hate speech, for summarizing an article I posted.
Apparently I'm not allowed to voice "OUR" neighbors objections, over "Their" neighbors from the south, cutting through "Their" yards, to get to "OURS".
They were "deflowering" the walkways, and taking other people's toys

I knew it was coming, because I got hit with the Bot heads up.
Apparently I post to quickly sometimes, so they stop me, and make me take the bot check.
I got hit twice on Wednesday, when Boss was making a point about the fact, that the Fire Department Union might back Biden, but the Fire Fighters don't.

I think Q gave us the heads up, on what happened to
I think probably alot of us got it. I know Paul Joseph Watson did, and he inferred that quite a few of us did.


Q dropped this video on the Karate Kid  along with these lines

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oP2F5CM30k📁
You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD.
May, 2019 – 'kick-off' 'start' 'offense'
Enjoy the show!
Q


What are the odds right?

The algorithms caught us.
An unmovable force, the proverbial brick wall.
Or is it?

How did the Karate Kid actually win?
He knew a different style, and his opponent couldn't counter punch it, because he didn't know the discipline. He was only trained to move in one way
Just like an algorithm