http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Airports-consider-apf-988435765.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=
It doesn't matter if it's TSA or private as long as the same TSA rules are going to apply!
FUCK FLYING!
The invasion of privacy is no longer worth the harassment to do it.
The passenger oriented security measures are a massive bunch of bogus bullshit. Between the skycaps and the non cargo security no matter how many people the airports screen your still not safe and the odds are your never going to be.
This is not a solution, it's just a substitution with the same purpose of style.
They heard your voice America, don't waste it by the compromising of nothing.
The name change doesn't take out the power trip.
Think about it.
In a climate of Internet campaigns to shun airport pat-downs and veteran pilots suing over their treatment by government screeners, some airports are considering another way to show dissatisfaction: Ditching TSA agents altogether.
Federal law allows airports to opt for screeners from the private sector instead. The push is being led by a powerful Florida congressman who's a longtime critic of the Transportation Security Administration and counts among his campaign contributors some of the companies who might take the TSA's place.
Private contractors are not a cure-all for passengers aggrieved about taking off their shoes for security checks, passing through full-body scanners or getting hand-frisked. For example, contractors must follow all TSA-mandated security procedures, including hand patdowns when necessary.
