http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/me_iraq0953_09_29.asp
Sounds bizarre doesn't it, but it also tells the truth of the American war tale. The taxpayer is footing the bill not so much for our own troops but for the private payment of the corporate foot soldier.
It's definitely time to see a break down on where all the money is going for the DoD.
Never before have our troops received the maid service that corporate America has so kindly been contracted to provide.
The big what if: if the perks of having the security provided by the corporate foot soldier were rescinded, would our military still know how to function?
WASHINGTON — U.S. private contractors have been killed at a faster rate than American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
A report said the deaths of private contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq have exceeded those of American soldiers in 2010. The report by ProPublica said this marked the first time in history that private employees have been dying at a faster rate than the soldiers of the U.S. military that contracted the civilians
George Orwell once said: In a universe designed by deceit, The truth is an act of Revolution
Showing posts with label corporate compensation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporate compensation. Show all posts
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
US pay law branded ‘logistical nightmare’
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/977211ac-b461-11df-8208-00144feabdc0.html
A logistic nightmare. How hard is it really to compare the compensations of the Brass, to that of those in the company who actually work for a living?
Why is the exchange rate now seen as a problem for the Brass of a company, it certainly seemed to pose no problem when Brass outsourced the work to garner cheaper labor.
Could it be that the Brass don't want you to see just how cheaply, that labor comes by, especially since a large portion of America is out of work?
A lobbyists job is never done.
US companies face a “logistical nightmare” from a new rule forcing them to disclose the ratio between their chief executive’s pay package and that of the typical employee, lawyers have warned.
The mandatory disclosure will provide ammunition for activists seeking to target perceived examples of excessive pay and perks. The law taps into public anger at the increasing disparity between the faltering incomes of middle America and the largely recession-proof multimillion-dollar remuneration of the typical corporate chief.
S&P 500 chief executives last year received median pay packages of $7.5m, according to executive compensation research firm Equilar. By comparison, official statistics show the average private sector employee was paid just over $40,000.
Business sees the disclosure provision – buried in section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank financial reform act – as a bureaucratic headache that may encourage false comparisons.
A logistic nightmare. How hard is it really to compare the compensations of the Brass, to that of those in the company who actually work for a living?
Why is the exchange rate now seen as a problem for the Brass of a company, it certainly seemed to pose no problem when Brass outsourced the work to garner cheaper labor.
Could it be that the Brass don't want you to see just how cheaply, that labor comes by, especially since a large portion of America is out of work?
A lobbyists job is never done.
US companies face a “logistical nightmare” from a new rule forcing them to disclose the ratio between their chief executive’s pay package and that of the typical employee, lawyers have warned.
The mandatory disclosure will provide ammunition for activists seeking to target perceived examples of excessive pay and perks. The law taps into public anger at the increasing disparity between the faltering incomes of middle America and the largely recession-proof multimillion-dollar remuneration of the typical corporate chief.
S&P 500 chief executives last year received median pay packages of $7.5m, according to executive compensation research firm Equilar. By comparison, official statistics show the average private sector employee was paid just over $40,000.
Business sees the disclosure provision – buried in section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank financial reform act – as a bureaucratic headache that may encourage false comparisons.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)